Oh, and btw, you will almost surely notice within the next day or two that a NASA representative will enter into this thread to "correct" all of my inaccuracies. For some reason, Astronomy Picture of the Day envisions part of its goal to be to convince the public to NOT read criticisms of the Standard Model. It's really too bad that the public is supporting this behavior when we are really just talking about using laboratory plasma physics to interpret astrophysical imagery.
Why does it matter whether there's hard evidence that things have happened already or not? Surely we can legislate to achieve or maintain a desirable state before it becomes a problem. That said, If it wasn't a problem that was happening already, the telcos wouldn't be complaining as loudly as they are.
I gotta say, this feels fake.
Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: does a tattoo on your hip hurt
Buried for the lack of captian Stubing. Cimon, Who doesn't love the Love Boat.?
if only they had the foresight to ban tops (only applies to women < 30)
Posted: 10 11 2009 Post subject: eagle tattoo west milford
This isn't 'science,' it's what we researchers like to call "*****.""Using tape recorders hidden in their handbags, the researchers took note of what female clubbers were wearing and how many times they were approached by men asking them to dance."The entire study is flawed through and through. Breaking body exposure down by percentages? Is exposing two arms worth as much as exposing an entire chest and stomach and back? Idiotic.They also conducted it in a night club: that's called ***** sampling. Anyone who reads this with even a hint of interest in it for knowledge is insane.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum